[hackmd](https://hackmd.io/3INm0EGoS5uS_S2ZxJNzaA) # 2021-08-25 conda-forge core meeting [last weeks meeting](https://hackmd.io/rKi3Rh-mTMKNBGtwQjwDcg) [What time is the meeting in my time zone](https://arewemeetingyet.com/UTC/2020-08-26/17:00/w/Conda-forge%20dev%20meeting#eyJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL2hhY2ttZC5pby9wUk15dFVKV1FmU3NJM2xvMGlqQzJRP2VkaXQifQ==) Meeting info: * To join the video meeting, click this link: https://meet.google.com/ijv-qsvm-tvn * Otherwise, to join by phone, dial +1 347-384-8597 and enter this PIN: 828 997 153# * To view more phone numbers, click this link: https://tel.meet/ijv-qsvm-tvn?hs=5 ## Attendees ## Agenda ### Standing items * [ ] intros for new folks on the call * [ ] (CJ) budget * current approvals? * Whenever updated numbers land, please screenshare and show the budget. * Link is in Keybase (numfocus_spreadsheets.txt) * [x] open votes * none #### From previous meeting(s) ### Your __new__() agenda items * (MRB) welcome to our new core members! * please make a PR adding yourself to core.csv in the docs if you have not (https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/blob/c31dfd4fe000d52beaf0e06adabc67b70820b348/src/core.csv) * Long-term video call options? * (MVN) Why not Flatiron zoom any more? * (ED) Voltron is happy to host but google meet is annoying because you have to "allow" everyone to join. Anyone else have a zoom option? * (CJW) NumFOCUS seems to be able to give us a zoom room (I asked them to create it under conda-forge-core@googlegroups.com in case we need it) * (MRB) new secrets/keys locations/handling * we've needed to clean this up a bit for a while now * now all shared keys are managed in the org secrets * eliminated the use of static tokens nearly everywhere in favor of github app generated tokens * generated token permissions have a small permission scope (basically read/write on repos and github actions triggers) * these tokens expire after one hour * still have static tokens in heroku and staged recipes * will be going through the current tokens and deactivating the ones I can * can we make some of the bot accounts non-admin users? * (FF) NumFOCUS updates * (IF) python 3.10 updates * unvendoring packages on windows * which means most python extensions will not be usable without activating env * _CONDA_PYTHON_SYSCONFIGDATA_NAME is removed * Need conda-build PR for 3.10.0rc1 * (CJW) Uwe's proposal to perform the python migration on 3.10rc1 https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/1499 * (CJW) Packaging-Con call for proposals, sponsorships * The CFP is open until August 30th * Packaging-Con is interested in corporate sponsors * JRG: Asking internally :) * (JL) PEP 668 proposed to improve interop between Python and distro package managers * Review: https://github.com/python/peps/pull/2056 * Rendered: https://github.com/python/peps/blob/e605832725b3a1f34d533bbcefbce6226fcfa1cb/pep-0668.rst * Related to Conda's interop functionality (https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda/en/latest/user-guide/configuration/pip-interoperability.html) * JRG: Will ask Filipe (FFY00) if they want to join the calls * (JL) Python bug about adding ability to add 3rd party install schemes * https://bugs.python.org/issue43976 * Might be interesting for Conda to support (referenced from Filipe at Quansight) * NUMFOCUS Wish List * https://hackmd.io/@RRHnS2XUSsKNtkPddhwnEw/H1YKZ-4bY * (JK) what happened with azure? * (JK) [ ] to email steve at microsoft ### Pushed to next meeting ### Active votes ### Subteam updates #### Bot #### ARM #### POWER #### CUDA #### Docs #### staged-recipes #### website #### security+systems ### CI infrastructure #### Compiler upgrade ### CFEP updates #### Open PRs * [cfep-12](https://github.com/conda-forge/cfep/pull/23) Removing packages that violate the terms of the source package * Stalled since May 26, 2020 * Active debate about moving to "broken" vs deleting from conda-forge channel * Active vote, ends on 2020-03-11 * What were the results of the vote? * Did we hear back from NumFOCUS? they did the legal seminar which is recorded ## Discussion ## Check in on previous action items Copy previous action items from last meeting agenda. ### This meeting ### Last meeting ### 2 meetings ago ### Move to Issue Tracker 2020-11-18 * [ ] (IF/MRB/MV) intel oneAPI * todo * [ ] (Nikolay) licensing for opencl_rt * [ ] (Nikolay) intelmpi ABI compat w/ mpich * [ ] (MRB/IF) figure out how exactly to package C/C++ compilers * [ ] (MRB/IF) think about fortran ABI * [x] (MRB) make conda-forge compilers room (add people including keith) * [ ] (MB) asking core members to move to "emeritus" status * [ ] TODO: Eric to set up quarterly check-in for all core members to see if they're interested in remaining "active" or if they want to move to emeritus * Remove emeritus folks from having access to various credentials (api tokens, twitter password, etc.)? This would require a change to the governance doc. 2020-11-11 * TODO: Think about bringing in JOSS to provide context around how we might best write papers 2020-11-03 * TODO: Check on Forrest Watters permissions for core * [x] (FF) Outreachy would cost 6500 USD. * Next steps: write abstract and vote on spending of funds. 2020-10-28 2020-10-21 * [ ] (Marius?) Python 2.7 migration * ( ) [ ] make a hint * ( ) [ ] make an announcement * ( ) [ ] make the hint a lint 2020-10-07 * [ ] Make sure to add the NVBug info to the cudatoolkit package that conda-forge makes (if we make one) 2020-09-09 * [ ] (ED) Update governance docs with similar voting model as what got put into conda-tools (+3 with no -1 is a pass) * [ ] (SC) Write jinja template to turn institutional partners yaml into a website https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/blob/2a2d3caaf7d74eb370ac40c679ba337a73d15c8a/src/inst_partners.yaml * [ ] (SC) Document what needs to be done to create an OVH account and get access 2020-08-26 **Docker hub** * [ ] (JK) Check in on Azure build workers to see if they have the docker hub limitation. * [ ] (JK) work with dockerhub to see if we can get OSS status * [ ] Check in again at some point. We haven't heard back as of 2020-09-23 **OVH** * [ ] Shout-out on twitter at some point. "Thanks forOVHCloud for providing a VM", etc. (maybe after we ship qt on windows with it?) * [ ] Figure out how to communicate breaking changes to users. Likely should open up an issue immediately for futher discussion. Ping @kkraus, plus capture notes from further up in these meeting notes * [ ] John K. will update the cuda toolkit feedstock on the git repo to note the NVBug link to the internal NVIDIA issue tracker * [ ] Jonathan will update docs to note that some non-exhaustive list of packages (like cuda-toolkit, MKL, etc.) * [ ] Jonathan will review this [PR](https://github.com/AnacondaRecipes/cudatoolkit-feedstock/pull/7) * [ ] (Kale) schedule conda working group * [ ] cfep-10 next steps: CJ to call a vote for feedback * [ ] cfep-06 next steps: Ask staged recipes team to champion this CFEP and move it forward * [ ] jakirkham & CJ-wright to sync on adding CUDA to the migration bot * [ ] (Eric) Scheduling Anaconda <-> conda-forge sync on anaconda.org requirements gathering * Will try and get this scheduled in the next month. * [ ] (Anthony) Reach out to NumFocus to figure out legal ramifications of not including licenses in files. * [ ] (Eric) check internally for funding levels for hotels & flying folks from the community in? * [ ] (Eric) Figure out finances of conda-forge to support themselves? * [ ] (jjhelmus) Open up CFEP for which python's we're going to support * [ ] (jakirkham) write a blog post on CUDA stuff we discussed today * [ ] (jakirkham) update docs on how to add CUDA support to feedstocks * [ ] (jakirkham) will open an issue on conda-smithy to investigate Drone issues. (ping the aarch team) * https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge.github.io/issues/954 * [ ] (ED) Who we are page? Some combination of a FAQ and a who is everyone. FAQ things like: * who's the POC for CF <> Anaconda, CF <> NumFocus, CF <> Azure * who's the POC for the various subteams? * Informal information: roles, day jobs, bios, the whole nine yards, why you're here, etc. * Public or internal? I don't really care either way. Anyone feel strongly one way or the other? * opt-in to public bios * software carpentry has a large number of instructors and has https://carpentries.org/instructors * some concern about "yet another place to keep stuff up to date" * [ ] (ED) document strategies for reproducible environments using conda-forge * [ ] (UK) Static libraries stuff * [ ] Add linting hints to builds to find them * [x] Recommend how to package them -> CFEP-18 * [x] We should write docs saying we don't provide support and this is a bad idea. -> CFEP-18